Bioavailability & Permeation
ChemAudit evaluates a molecule's potential for oral bioavailability and membrane permeation using two complementary models: the Bioavailability Radar (6-axis physicochemical profile) and the BOILED-Egg classification (GI absorption and BBB penetration).
Both models appear in the Scoring Profiles tab under the "Bioavailability & Permeation" card after validating a molecule.
Bioavailability Radar
The Bioavailability Radar is a 6-axis normalized assessment of oral bioavailability. Each axis represents a physicochemical property critical for a drug to be absorbed orally. If all six properties fall within their optimal ranges, the molecule has an excellent oral bioavailability profile.
The Six Axes
| Axis | Property | Optimal Range | Unit | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIPO | WLOGP (Lipophilicity) | -0.7 to 5.0 | — | Governs membrane permeability. Too hydrophilic = poor absorption; too lipophilic = poor solubility and toxicity risk. Upper bound from Lipinski's Rule of Five. |
| SIZE | Molecular Weight | 150 to 500 | Da | Larger molecules diffuse poorly across membranes. Upper bound of 500 Da from Lipinski's Rule of Five. |
| POLAR | TPSA (Topological Polar Surface Area) | 20 to 130 | A² | Reflects surface polarity. Values above ~140 A² correlate with poor intestinal absorption. Based on Veber's rules. |
| INSOLU | LogS (ESOL aqueous solubility) | -6 to 0 | log mol/L | A drug must dissolve in GI fluid before absorption. LogS below -6 indicates very poor solubility. |
| INSATU | Fraction Csp3 (sp3 carbon fraction) | ≥ 0.25 | ratio | Measures 3D character. Higher Fsp3 improves solubility and clinical success. From Lovering et al.'s "Escape from Flatland." |
| FLEX | Rotatable Bonds | ≤ 9 | count | Excessive flexibility imposes entropic penalties on binding and reduces oral bioavailability. Based on Veber's rules. |
Interpretation
| In-Range Count | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 6/6 | Excellent bioavailability profile |
| 4–5/6 | Good profile |
| 2–3/6 | Moderate profile — some properties outside optimal ranges |
| 0–1/6 | Poor profile — significant bioavailability concerns |
Normalization
Each axis is normalized to a 0–1 scale:
- Within optimal range: normalized value = 1.0
- Outside range: linearly decreases toward 0 based on distance from the range boundary, reaching 0 at a distance equal to the range width
Implementation Note
ChemAudit uses WLOGP (Wildman-Crippen LogP via RDKit's Crippen.MolLogP) for the lipophilicity axis. The original SwissADME paper uses XLOGP3 for the radar. Both are well-validated lipophilicity descriptors with closely correlated values, and the same optimal ranges apply.
BOILED-Egg Classification
BOILED-Egg stands for Brain Or IntestinaL EstimateD permeation. It is a graphical model that simultaneously predicts passive gastrointestinal (GI) absorption and blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration using only two molecular descriptors:
- X-axis: TPSA (Topological Polar Surface Area)
- Y-axis: WLOGP (Wildman-Crippen LogP)
Classification Regions
The model defines three zones on a TPSA vs WLOGP scatter plot:
| Region | Color | Meaning | Approximate Boundaries |
|---|---|---|---|
| White | Green | High probability of passive GI absorption | TPSA < ~142 A², WLOGP between ~-2.3 and ~+6.8 |
| Yolk | Amber | High probability of BBB permeation (also GI absorbed) | TPSA < ~79 A², WLOGP between ~+0.4 and ~+6.0 |
| Grey | Grey | Predicted as neither passively GI-absorbed nor BBB-permeant | Outside both ellipses |
A molecule in the yolk is always also in the white — BBB-permeant compounds are predicted to be GI-absorbed as well, consistent with biological reality.
Elliptical Model
Each region is defined by an ellipse in the TPSA-WLOGP plane. A molecule's (TPSA, WLOGP) point is tested against each ellipse using the standard point-in-ellipse equation:
((TPSA - cx) / a)² + ((WLOGP - cy) / b)² ≤ 1
Where (cx, cy) is the ellipse center and (a, b) are the semi-axes. The ellipse parameters were optimized using Monte-Carlo optimization evaluated by the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC).
Accuracy
| Metric | GI Absorption (White) | BBB Permeation (Yolk) |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Accuracy | 93% | 90% |
| Internal MCC | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| 10-fold CV Accuracy | 92% | 88% |
| 10-fold CV MCC | 0.65 | 0.75 |
| External Validation (46 FDA NCEs) | 83% | — |
Training Data
- GI absorption dataset: 660 molecules (567 well-absorbed, 93 poorly absorbed)
- BBB permeation dataset: 260 molecules (156 BBB-permeant, 104 non-permeant)
References
-
Bioavailability Radar / SwissADME: Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42717. DOI: 10.1038/srep42717
-
BOILED-Egg: Daina A, Zoete V. A BOILED-Egg to predict gastrointestinal absorption and brain penetration of small molecules. ChemMedChem 2016, 11(11), 1117–1121. DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201600182
-
Wildman-Crippen LogP (WLOGP): Wildman SA, Crippen GM. Prediction of physicochemical parameters by atomic contributions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39(5), 868–873. DOI: 10.1021/ci990307l
-
Lipinski's Rule of Five: Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 46(1-3), 3–26. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00129-0
-
Veber Rules: Veber DF, Johnson SR, Cheng HY, Smith BR, Ward KW, Kopple KD. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45(12), 2615–2623. DOI: 10.1021/jm020017n
-
Escape from Flatland (Fsp3): Lovering F, Bikker J, Humblet C. Escape from flatland: increasing saturation as an approach to improving clinical success. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52(21), 6752–6756. DOI: 10.1021/jm901241e
-
ESOL Solubility: Delaney JS. ESOL: estimating aqueous solubility directly from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44(3), 1000–1005. DOI: 10.1021/ci034243x
Next Steps
- ADMET — SA Score, ESOL, CNS MPO, and pharmaceutical rules
- Drug-likeness — Lipinski, QED, Veber, and consensus scoring
- Scoring Overview — All scoring systems at a glance
- Scoring Profiles — Custom thresholds and desirability scoring